Leclerc reflects on mistake by Antonelli after F1 Dutch GP DNF

Charles Leclerc's Dutch GP result was far from what Ferrari hoped for at the Dutch GP.
Photo Credit: Formula 1
Spread the love

Charles Leclerc’s F1 Dutch GP result was far from what Ferrari hoped for. The Ferrari driver’s race ended prematurely following a collision with Mercedes rookie Kimi Antonelli. Despite showing improved pace as the event went on, Leclerc’s weekend was defined by frustration and missed opportunities.

The Antonelli Incident

Leclerc’s F1 Dutch GP result came to an abrupt halt due to what he described as an overly aggressive move.

I think it’s a mistake from Kimi,” Leclerc bluntly stated when asked about the incident. He acknowledged that Zandvoort demands aggressive driving for overtaking opportunities.

You’ve got to be very aggressive on a track like this to overtake, which I think he tried to be aggressive,” Leclerc explained. However, he felt that the Mercedes rookie went slightly too far.

Maybe it was a bit too much. He went on to touch my rear left and that was the end of my race. It’s disappointing.”

When pressed about whether it was a rookie mistake Leclerc offered a balanced perspective.

I wouldn’t describe it as a rookie mistake. I think it’s just a mistake which can happen the first year or the fifth year.

He maintained that aggressive driving is necessary at Zandvoort to make moves as the track is narrow and difficult to follow at.

On a track like this you need to be aggressive, but that was too much.

Battle with Russell shows Leclerc’s aggression

Before the incident that led to Leclerc’s F1 Dutch GP result, he engaged in fierce battle with George Russell. The Ferrari driver defended his approach when questioned about their on-track battle at turns 11 and 12.

It was aggressive, but we’re fighting for a place in the championship. For the Constructors’ especially. For the Drivers’, I don’t really care. I’ll always be aggressive like that,” Leclerc stated.

Leclerc revealed his tactical thinking during the Russell encounter. “He defended the inside, I went for the outside. I don’t think he expected me to go for the outside.

The move was calculated despite the risks involved.

It was on the limit, but I knew I wouldn’t have many opportunities after that.”

The contact between the two drivers sparked steward investigation.

“Then he did the corner just like if I wasn’t there. Then we touched,” Leclerc stated.

Stewards’ Final Decision

Before the decision, Leclerc expressed uncertainty about the process.

I don’t know what the stewards are looking at or what they are expecting from the incident. I’ll go and see them and then we’ll see.”

He then proceeded to express his preference for immediate decisions. “It’s always better to have a live decision. I understand that sometimes it’s not a clear cut.”

The investigation concluded with no action taken on Leclerc’s F1 Dutch GP incident with Russell.

Strategy questions remain unanswered

The premature end to Leclerc’s F1 Dutch GP result left strategic questions unresolved. The Ferrari driver was positive about his hard tyres before the incident. “The tyres weren’t too bad,” he confirmed when asked about his radio messages.

I think judging the out lap of Kimi was probably very strong. I think the team decided to pit me because they thought that he would probably get past us again.

The timing of the pit stop became irrelevant due to the crash.

“At the end, I was frustrated for what had just happened. I don’t think the strategy is a big talking point today. I think it’s just Kimi’s mistake that threw out every effort we had in the bin.” Leclerc then continued saying, “I don’t think it was wrong. Only by finishing the race, we would have known whether it was a good choice or not. We didn’t because of the crash with Kimi. It’s a bit difficult to know.

Friday struggles cast shadow

Despite the improved race pace that could have influenced Leclerc’s F1 Dutch GP result, the weekend’s foundation was shaky. The Ferrari driver was candid about their Friday difficulties. “We’ve been struggling from FP1 to Quali,” he admitted.

Leclerc acknowledged some positive elements but remained realistic about the overall picture. “We can see positives in every situation, but I would rather look at it as a very disappointing weekend.

The struggles were particularly difficult for the team.

In the race, it’s been better, but especially after the holidays, to have a Friday like we’ve had, we cannot afford to have any other Friday like that because that definitely has an influence on the rest of the weekend,” Leclerc warned. The Friday performance directly impacted their competitiveness throughout the weekend.

Leclerc’s measured response

Leclerc’s Dutch GP result may have been disappointing, but his handling of adversity impressed observers. He refused to make excuses while identifying areas for improvement. The weekend served as both setback and learning opportunity for the championship contender.