Russell unhappy with “selfish” teams regarding blocking changes to F1 2026 race starts

George Russell reveals how a little-known energy rule caused confusion at F1 2026 race starts and why the FIA cannot change it yet
Photo Credit: Mercedes F1 Team
Spread the love

Mercedes driver George Russell shed light on the unusual circumstances that affected race starts during the opening round of the 2026 F1 season. The Mercedes driver pointed to a little-known energy recovery regulation that influenced how much electrical deployment drivers had available before the race even began.

The rule, which limits energy harvesting each lap, created unexpected complications during the formation lap and caught several teams off guard. As a result, drivers starting near the front of the grid found themselves managing their energy usage earlier than anticipated, contributing to confusion during the run to the start.

Unusual harvest rule sparks confusion at the start

Russell explained that a little-known energy recovery regulation played a role in the chaotic start situation of the first F1 race in the 2026 season that almost resulted in contact with Franco Colapinto.

According to the Mercedes driver, the harvest limit applied during the formation lap caught several teams by surprise and created an uneven situation across the grid. Drivers starting near the front crossed the timing line earlier, meaning their energy usage already counted towards the limit for that lap before the race had even begun.

As a result, some drivers entered the start procedure with significantly less available energy than others further back on the grid.

“Well, I think there was an error that caught a lot of teams out, which was the harvest limit on the formation lap. So, a very quirky rule, I don’t know if you guys know this or not, every lap there’s a harvest limit. The drivers who started in the first half of the grid, who were beyond the timing line, they were already within that lap.”

Russell explains how harvest rule disadvantaged front-runners at 2026 F1 race starts

Russell went on to explain that the rule meant drivers at the front of the grid effectively began using their energy allocation earlier than those starting further back. Because they crossed the timing line sooner during the formation lap, their energy harvesting and deployment already counted towards the limit for that lap. This left them with significantly less available energy before the race had even begun.

Drivers further down the order, meanwhile, crossed the line later and therefore according to Russell benefited from the system resetting sooner, creating an uneven situation across the grid heading into the start at the 2026 F1 season.

“So when you did your formation lap start, you’re spending your battery, and you’re charging your battery, which goes towards your harvest limit. The drivers at the back, when they do their formation lap at the start, they then launch away, they cross the start-finish line, and then it resets because they’re effectively on the next lap. So, from what we did in the practise starts, we did the launch before this line, and it reset, and on the race start, starting from pole, I went up the throttle, I charged the battery, but it took like 50% of my harvest limit of that lap.

“When I got halfway around the track, I could no longer charge the battery, I had no power to do proper burnouts. So, yeah, the FIA were looking to potentially adjust that, but as you can imagine, some teams who are making good starts didn’t want it, which I think is just a little bit silly, but I’m not overly concerned, but it’s definitely a challenge.”

Harvest rule likely to remain as teams fail to reach agreement

Russell added that the FIA had considered adjusting the rule but required a supermajority from the teams to make the change. According to the Mercedes driver, that level of support had not been reached, leaving the regulation in place despite the complications it created.

“They could do, I think they want to, but they need a super majority from the teams, which they don’t have. So you can probably guess which team is against that. I don’t think their gain is coming, it isn’t coming from this issue.”

Russell suggested that, with teams like Mercedes now aware of the problem, they would simply adapt their approach going forward. He also noted that removing the harvest limit altogether would simplify the procedure, though he acknowledged that teams often prioritise their own competitive interests when such decisions arise. The Brit seemed to be hinting at Scuderia Ferrari.

“Now the teams know the problem, we’ll just drive around it, but it’s just creating a bit of unnecessary complications to something that doesn’t really need to be there. So, as I said, half the grid messed up in Melbourne. We’ll adjust, we know what we need to be wary of now.

“The FIA could just want to make our life easier and just remove this harvest limit, but as often people have selfish views, and they want to do what’s best for themselves, and that’s part of Formula 1 and part of the challenge of Formula 1, we’ll deal with it. I think the start here will be much better.”